Trickle Down God  

Posted by Jesse Malott


Recently I have been reading N.T. Wright's latest homerun, Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church. While I do not always agree with everything Wright says (this does not happen often), I very much appreciate his level of analysis of very complicated matters without making them pat or trite, while also being able to relate to non-academic audiences. He is currently the Bishop of Durham, one in a long series of very important posts. Previously, he was also in the academic world serving as a heavy hitter amongst the exegetical world of heavy hitters. He is known for saying he left the academic world because he got more"buzz" from being with clergy in the trenches more than students wanting to just finish their tutorials (see Christianity Today, June 2004).


Sometimes we find an academic who at least hopes that his work will trickle down to the masses and won't get lodged in the ivory tower of the academy - that it will be of some earthly good. Yet, being both an academic and a pastor (I'm not speaking of myself) lends itself to criticisms on both accounts. From the church, you hear complaints about not being relevant enough to the people or perhaps a snobby academic. From the academy, you hear that you are washed up, not publishing enough, too biased by the practical to be a good scholar of the texts. C.S. Lewis was criticized by his fellow academics for his children's books and his writings on Christianity because they were not serious scholarship. Yet, here we stand a half-century later, a changed people because of his direct influence upon the people.


Lewis himself said, "The problem when I became a believer in England was that you were left with either the hysterical rantings of the fanatics, or the intellectual elite of the clergy.... Had theologians been doing their work, I would have been unnecessary."


We, the evangelical church have become a wreckless mass of fanatical lunacy for the shallow experience and showy worship that dominates the scene of churches today. We have lost touch of the depth and richness of God and of the words of those who have gone before us. The academics are so far removed from the masses, that usually even pastors no longer read works of theology, but have traded them in for church growth how-to manuals.


The academics are the lost ancients to the church and must be found again. The academics must learn again to be vital in the lives of the people and of the life of the church. Perhaps, we need to retrain Christian scholarship so that from beginning to end, theology is grounded in the life of the church. The people are thirsty for depth, hungry for the meat of the Word and for the profoundness of the plethora of the wisdom and knowledge of God.


But how do we bridge this gap so that the masses are no longer receiving trickles but the full flow of the depth and His knowledge and grace?


This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 at 3:33 PM . You can follow any responses to this entry through the comments feed .

5 comments

Amen brother. This book is patiently awaiting on my bookshelf.

Academics have been removed from the church world, because academic brain power remove themselves.

I see that academics use such a high concentrated vocabulary that at times it is difficult understand what is being said for your average joe.

Seminarian trained pastors may have comprehension to the scholarship, but where in their pastoral schedule can they find time to unpack the idea heaven is not our home? Yes I know it is imperative to be thinking theologically all the time, but our time is booked solid.

And remember--this is why you went to seminary, to study theology. So there is no need to do it again.
Why would you want to be thinking through fresh theological content?

Also there is a level of eliteness that comes with these academics. Since they have the "elite badge" they can out smart, out articulate, and out think the current eccelsiology their local church is subscribing to. They are paid to write books and generate these abstract-grand ideas that rarely land in a practical way. (I know I am generalizing here)

Two weeks ago I had lunch with two professors from Vanguard. I asked them where they go to church and they said they have a hard time attending a church. They love Jesus, but they have a difficult time with the level of ignorance and insensitivities their local costa mesa church's posses.

They offered some valuable questions: Why would we want to belong to a church, where my wife could not preach or teach men? Why would I want to attend a church where my political agenda is not accepted? Why would I want to attend a church would not effectively answer my questions?

Basically they were saying: We are smart. We get it. We have done our homework and we believe we have great theology. However our local churches do not have great theology.

Jesse I hear ya man. How do we assimulate not only our students in to the church body, but our academics?

Ray Anderson models this soo well. Here is a distinguished professor while also a fully functional church body member. Dr. Scholler is another great example.

Dr. Beaton is another example of a great scholar struggling through the fundamentalist naivete of the local church.

Yes we want the academics in our church, but do they want to be apart of the church?

How cool would it be to have Ray Anderson leading your Christianity 101 class?

Maybe some of these scholars get down from their ivory tower and sit in the pews and listen to some of the hurting cries of people. And now lets talk about theology!!!!!

April 2, 2008 at 11:41 AM

It is such a dream of mine to bring the academics back into the life of the church. If we could learn from them and they could serve with us, what a wonderful Kingdom presence we could be.

I hear you with those two professors. It has been the cry of Evangelical Christianity that the value of education should be minimized. Why would they they want to be part of an organization that condemns what they are about?

Good response.

April 2, 2008 at 9:59 PM
Anonymous  

"Why would we want to belong to a church, where my wife could not preach or teach men?"

Oh, I don't know...maybe Paul could help?

Paul laid down the qualifications for a pastor in I Timothy 3:1-7. In verse two, he states that a bishop (pastor or over-seer of a congregation) must be "the husband of one wife" which eliminates any woman from consideration for the office. Also in verse two Paul states that a bishop must be "apt to teach." Teaching is one of the primary responsibilities of a pastor, yet the scriptures forbid a woman to teach men. "Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." (I Timothy 2:11-12) Any woman who steps into the pulpit to teach or preach the doctrines of the Word to a congregation violates the very Scriptures she is teaching!

Along this same line Paul told the saints at Corinth: "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." (I Corinthians 14:34-35) Paul is stating that the God of order has placed in His churches a restriction upon women. They are not permitted to preach or teach men, and it is a shame for them to do so.

Furthermore, the office of the pastor is a position of authority. The writer of Hebrews, speaking of the pastor, said; "Obey them that have the rule over you." (Hebrews 13:17). This office cannot be occupied scripturally by a woman for the scriptures clearly state she cannot usurp authority over the man (I Timothy 2:12).

April 5, 2008 at 9:54 AM

I am surprised by:
1. this post
2. hope
3. and I like what "the bishop" said

April 16, 2008 at 8:04 AM
This comment has been removed by the author.
April 30, 2008 at 10:35 AM

Post a Comment